Should We Stay Or Should We Go
for Hot Zone blog Moffett Field CA (SPX) Nov 24, 2010 Back in the late 1960s, the environmental movement was in a tizzy over predictions that overpopulation would soon cause mass human starvation and eventually kill the planet. But the Malthusian vision fell to the wayside once the Green Revolution made farming that much more productive and countries began enacting environmental reforms that lessened some of the worst abuses in pollution. These days you don't hear much concern over the size of Earth's ballooning human population, even as it reaches nearly 7 billion people - nearly twice the population of 1970. Yet the topic has popped up again, this time in the context of climate change. In a paper to be published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers led by the National Center for Atmospheric Research found that adding another three billion people by mid-century (considered a conservative population estimate) could reverse many of the gains won in greenhouse gas emissions reductions. A 16 to 29 percent reduction in emissions - deemed necessary to stem the serious consequences of rising global temperatures - would be offset by the additional carbon produced by the extra people. Of course, the problem would be helped by lowering the world's birth rate. "A slowing of population growth in developing countries today will have a large impact on future global population size. However, slower population growth in developed countries will matter to emissions, too, because of higher per capita energy use," said Shonali Pachauri, a researcher at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in a UCAR press release. The researchers went on to analyze which subsets of the population would add the most emissions. Surprisingly to smart growth advocates, a growth in the urban population could lead to a 25 percent rise in emissions in some developing countries - particularly China and India - because city living tends to lead to economic growth and higher rates of consumption. An aging population reduces emissions because of lower productivity. Population growth is a condition not typically considered in climate scenarios, but arguably should be, since it's surely not going to remain stagnant.
Commerical space travel could threaten the climate With companies like Spaceport America opening the world's first commercial spaceport in Las Cruces, New Mexico earlier this month and Virgin Galactic now booking $200,000 space tours, it seems the future of space travel could be right around the bend. Congress is investing $1.6 billion in private space-flight investments through NASA to kick-start the fledgling industry, particularly in the outsourcing of astronaut and cargo transport. Not to put a damper on all the hype, but it seems there's been one overlooked aspect of expanding travel into space. As you can imagine knowing the kind of damage that landlubbing and ocean-spewing vehicles wreak on the climate, spacebound vehicles will also contribute to global warming. A paper published in a recent journal of the Geophysical Research Letters indicates that emissions from 1,000 private rocket launches a year could increase the surface temperatures at the poles by 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit and reduce polar sea ice between 5-15 percent. The author, Martin Ross, an atmospheric scientist at the Aerospace Corporation in Los Angeles, came up with the estimate using global atmospheric models that took into account the emissions of 600 tons of black carbon a year above Las Cruces. The results showed a soot layer persisted within 10 degrees latitude in the stratosphere the spaceport, while some 80 percent of it spread to 25-45 degrees. This caused a cooling effect in the tropics and subtropics, while the poles got warmer. Ozone was also reduced in the tropics, while increasing at the poles. The scientists believe the results show that private rocket launches could alter circulation in the atmosphere and the distribution of ozone - surprisingly even with emissions that occur at one point (the spaceport). The big problem with dumping emissions into the stratosphere is that, unlike the atmosphere near the Earth's surface, rain and weather never wash them away. Maybe it's wise for the nascent space travel to go green with low-emissions vehicles right from initial take off.
Share This Article With Planet Earth
Related Links Hot Zone blog Space Tourism, Space Transport and Space Exploration News
Graduation Of Europe's New Astronauts Paris, France (ESA) Nov 23, 2010 ESA's six latest astronaut candidates proudly received their diplomas at the European Astronaut Centre in Cologne, Germany. From now on, they are officially 'astronauts'. The new astronauts, smiling in their blue overalls, were in the spotlight at ESA's training centre. They were presented with their certificates signed by Jean-Jacques Dordain, Director General, Simonetta Di Pippo, Directo ... read more |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2010 - SpaceDaily. AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |